Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates
Skip to: |
Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.
If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here. The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results. If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.
A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture. For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance. Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.
|
Featured picture tools: |
Step 1:
Evaluate Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations. |
Step 2:
Create a subpage
To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.
To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.
|
Step 3:
Transclude and link Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list ( ). |
How to comment for Candidate Images
How to comment for Delist Images
Editing candidates
Is my monitor adjusted correctly? In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting. Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting. On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate. Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended. |
- To see recent changes, .
FPCs needing feedback
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Brumadinho dam disaster
| ||||
Siege of Recife (1630)
| ||||
Indian Territory |
Current nominations
[edit]Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 21:29:49 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. Illustrates article well with high EV. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- European hamster, Meidling
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 21:34:12 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. Illustrates article well with high EV. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Humpback whale
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 21:37:50 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. Illustrates article well with high EV.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Parti-coloured bat, Vespertilionidae
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 11:09:00 (UTC)
- Reason
- famous picture with its own article, high resolution, good quality, FP on Commons
- Articles in which this image appears
- Flight of Refugees Across Wrecked Bridge in Korea, 1951 Pulitzer Prize, Pulitzer Prize for Photography, Max Desfor, Taedong Bridge, UN Forces retreat from North Korea, December 1950
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War
- Creator
- Max Desfor
- Support as nominator Surprisingly this is not yet FP. – Yann (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 11:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2025 at 15:34:02 (UTC)
- Reason
- Interesting and well-composed shot of the inside of a tokamak. There are some hot spots, like the back of the technician's coveralls, but I'd argue those aren't the focal point of the image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Tokamak, DIII-D
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
- Creator
- Rswilcox
- Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 15:34, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ArionStar (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – I too thought of nominating this. Happy to support. Bammesk (talk) 02:02, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 11:11, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Very strong chromatic aberrations -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak Support.. / RemoveRedSky [talk] 15:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2025 at 23:34:19 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV; this huge scan is full of details and depicts very well a part of the local history.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Siege of Recife (1630), Dutch–Portuguese War, Dutch Brazil, Dutch invasions of Brazil and Camarão Indians' letters.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
- Creator
- Nicolaes Visscher I (originally uploaded by Juniorpetjua and enlarged version uploaded by Giro720)
- Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2025 at 18:03:32 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV and good scan with huge resolution
- Articles in which this image appears
- Indian Territory and Seminole burning
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
- Creator
- United States. Bureau Of The Census (uploaded by Fæ)
- Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 18:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2025 at 16:10:26 (UTC)
- Reason
- It is a rich diagram of all objects that can exist and could ever have existed. It connects the Schwarzchild Limit to the Big Bang, to the Compton Limit to the heat death of the universe. It contains both stellar evolution and particle decay, it connects a line from chemistry to biology to astronomy.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Compton Wavelength, Schwarzschild Radius, Planck Units
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps
- Creator
- Alex Van de Sande
- Support as nominator – Alex Van de Sande (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - Way too complex to be understandable by the general reader. At least one typo. Also a whiff of WP:OR (hedgehog? ;-) --Janke | Talk 07:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's not original research, it's a redesign of a chart from this paper.
- (sorry about any typo that might have escaped. Care to share which one it is?) Alex Van de Sande (talk) 11:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Interesting and high EV, but it is only used in Compton Wavelength. @Janke: This is clearly understandable by anyone with basic knowledge of modern physics. No need to have a PhD for that. Yann (talk) 11:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann: I said general reader, meaning average reader. It has nothing to do with the fact that you and I do have enough knowledge to understand it... --Janke | Talk 16:40, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Janke: Then I don't understand the criteria. This image is much easier to understand than the articles it could be added, so what's the point? Actually this image helps to understand the concepts represented, so that's the whole point to have images in these articles. Yann (talk) 17:41, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- I had added it to schwarzschild radius, Compton wavelength, Hubble radius and Planck units, as I think it adds understanding to these articles, but the edits were reverted as other editors thought I was adding to too many articles at once. I will also add alternatives to it without the cutout which I hope will make it less cluttered. Alex Van de Sande (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- That was reverted... Yann (talk) 17:41, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- A really relevant image can be in lots of articles, but in those, the other editors must have considered it irrelevant. --Janke | Talk 16:40, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose, apologetically – This would be a cool thing to have on a science classroom wall but it's overly fancy for Wikipedia. The atoms arguably don't need to be shown as clouds of electron orbitals, for instance, and those orbitals definitely don't need to be in a rainbow of colors. The whole image, minus the text, seems to have a film grain overlay that only makes the information harder to parse. And a lot of the raster elements (i.e., the planets) are pixelated at full magnification. This is a fun image, and I thank you for making it, but I don't think it meets the technical standards of the criteria. Moonreach (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I admit it has many stylized elements added to make it more visually appealing. If you look at the original chart from the paper, it doesn't have these elements and is (IMHO) neither appealing nor less confusing. I limited the size because I was at first trying to get a SVG image, but very quickly reached the SVG limit. I can get a bigger size if that means the image is going to be appreciated more (which unfortunately doesn't seem to be the case). Alex Van de Sande (talk) 18:48, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 16:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- I would argue the articles that it's supposed to illustrate, Compton Limit, Schwarzchild Radius, Planck Units, etc, are not intelligible to general readers either. It's my opinion that it makes these articles easier to understand. Alex Van de Sande (talk) 18:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment – User:Avsa, FP criterion #5 says "wait a reasonable period of time (at least 7 days)". You didn't do that. Also the article editors reverted you. FP images have to be stable. I would vote support and I think User:Yann will also support if you find an article (or a couple of articles) that are well suited for what this image shows, then wait 2 or 3 weeks to make sure the image is stable, and then re-nominate the image. The passing threshold is 5 support votes min. (that includes the nominator) and support/oppose ratio of 2/1 or better. You already have 3 supports. I didn't look hard, but maybe the image can be added to a more-of-a-concept-type article, like Cosmological horizon or Observable universe, etc. I don't agree with the "general or average reader" oppose rationales above. That's not a FP criterion. FP images have to enhance the quality of an article (or articles). They have to be comprehensible (i.e. useful) to those who read and comprehend the article, not just to any average person. We are not a pop magazine catering to some generic "general" reader or audience. Bammesk (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will follow your advice. Alex Van de Sande (talk) 12:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - Following up on my comments from User:Remsense's talk page: There's far too much going on in the image, the various colors (including the reflections across the Schwarzschild and Compton axes) make it harder to read, many of the fonts are too small. Even on my high-DPI monitor, I can't read most of it without zooming in a lot. I didn't revert the Compton Limit addition because that was the only article it was added to that had pre-existing text that could be conceived as being related to this figure, but even there I think it's a bit of a stretch. There's so many things in this figure that most articles only relate to a small part of it. If the figure were redone to be less busy, have better font choices (preferably as a vector image so the fonts scale better) and have less extraneous color, I might reconsider. - Parejkoj (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2025 at 01:59:54 (UTC)
- Reason
- Per below
- Articles in which this image appears
- Skin care, Cosmetics, Pharmacy (shop) and Product (business)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Other
- Creator
- ArionStar
- Support as nominator High EV; an useful image in many articles and shows a variety of skin care cosmetics and brands: Swiss Galderma's Cetaphil, French Laboratoires Pierre Fabre's Avène, American Stiefel Laboratories' Physiogel, American Kenvue's Neostrata (same owner of Neutrogena), German Beiersdorf's Eucerin, Brazilian ADCOS, etc. – ArionStar (talk) 01:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see the EV or particular photographic merit. Was withdrawn at Commons FPC. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Different projects, different criteria… ArionStar (talk) 11:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sure; but many people, including me, reference Commons, e.g. see nom. below 'Unanimously featured on Commons'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Different projects, different criteria… ArionStar (talk) 11:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose – Completely lacking in EV; scant visual interest. – Sca (talk) 14:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks to the feedbacks above; I appreciate them. I came to the conclusion that the criteria here are more difficult for me to understand than on Commons. ArionStar (talk) 16:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2025 at 11:47:53 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Donggung Palace and Wolji Pond
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Basile Morin
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I don't really like night shots as FP but this is a better composition than the daylight ones. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, MER-C, for the nomination, and for including this photo in the article. This building is splendid at blue hour (in real life). -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I'm usually not a fan of reflection shots, but the night view here is an icon of Gyeongju, so EV is good. It's also a well executed photo. Nick-D (talk) 05:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Vulcan loves the night light and view! –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2025 at 11:42:17 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons. Adds EV to article. (The signature is cut off in the original.)
- Articles in which this image appears
- Mary Pickford
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Title Insurance and Trust, and C.C. Pierce Photography Collection
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:42, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment – The restoration can be improved. There are 3 dark horizontal lines, 2 below her chin, and one above her chin. Also there is a scratch line on her nose extending to the right. Bammesk (talk) 19:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done: Restored. I also removed some spots. Yann (talk) 20:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 22:09, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Better now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2025 at 23:38:24 (UTC)
- Reason
- Un Chien Andalou is among the most famous avant-garde films and is on our list of vital articles. Having been first published in 1929, it entered the U.S. public domain this year. The original version did not have synchronized sound; this copy omits a copyrighted soundtrack made much later as part of a 1960 restoration.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Un Chien Andalou, Luis Buñuel, Salvador Dalí
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- Luis Buñuel (director)
- Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 23:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Notable film, good quality. --Yann (talk) 08:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment – Yucch. – Sca (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - Unfortunately, this appears to be a transfer from a sound print, which cuts away a considerable part of the image, especially at left. Note the end title, it is cut off! Also, multiple printing generations have hiked the contrast so that highlights are clipped in some scenes. --Janke | Talk 17:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Janke. – Moonreach (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 21:35:20 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality image. Adds value to article. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Pink whipray
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 22:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Striking viewpoint. We feel the dynamics. -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support! / RemoveRedSky [talk] 16:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 21:42:19 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality image. Adds significant EV to article.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Flame-rumped tanager
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:35, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Educational, beautiful bokeh, compelling composition. -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support! / RemoveRedSky [talk] 20:11, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 21:46:58 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. Adds EV to article.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Adder
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent DoF, nice light and composition. -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 15:32:09 (UTC)
- Reason
- high quality portrait used as lead image
- Articles in which this image appears
- Jen Guyton, National Geographic Society
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
- Creator
- Fuzheado
- Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support She does good work. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment — To me it seems like there's a bit too much extra space above the top of her head. Moonreach (talk) 14:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Moonreach, Charlesjsharp, Hamid Hassani, and ArionStar: I added an alternative, cropped at the top. Yann (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I think this looks better. Thanks! Moonreach (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1 — Moonreach (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1 –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Alt 1 I don't think we should be cropping other photographer's photos. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2025 at 21:29:17 (UTC)
- Reason
- HQ, long time image of Miles David
- Articles in which this image appears
- Miles Davis, etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Tom Palumbo
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose, for a couple of reasons. The first is that I can't track the provenance; the Flickr link in the metadata is dead and the Wayback Machine doesn't have a cached copy, just 404s. The second is that the details look weird to me, like the hair on his forearm and the rumpling in his shirt. I wonder if this was upscaled somehow, although the newer version from early 2021 would seem to preclude the current generative AI boom, which started maybe 18 months later. I quite like the underlying image, though, and if I didn't have these doubts I'd happily support it. Moonreach (talk) 15:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2025 at 20:15:24 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- National Theater and Concert Hall, Taipei
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Supanut Arunoprayote
- Support as nominator Good and useful images of an active collaborator in the wiki community. – ArionStar (talk) 20:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Unremarkable and technically flawed (the very edges of the roof are cut off) photo of an easy to photograph building in central Taipei. The image also seems to have been photoshopped to remove the people in the foreground, which I'm not in favour of: the square here is quite busy during the day, so this is a dishonest representation of the building's surrounds. I suspect that there aren't many people around in the early mornings. Nick-D (talk) 23:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Undescribed modifications are a worrying problem for nominators. I think it's time to buy a camera and visit some cities instead… ArionStar (talk) 03:09, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2025 at 11:24:45 (UTC)
- Reason
- high quality and resolution image used as lead
- Articles in which this image appears
- Gene Autry
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Harry Warnecke and Robert F. Cranston, restored by Yann
- Support as nominator I replaced a low resolution version by the same picture in higher resolution with restoration. – Yann (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support But three red marks for editing? Collar, left sleeve, lower leg. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Question Am I wrong about the red marks Yann. I don't think my vote a couple of days ago displayed properly? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah yes, right. I removed a few more spots. Thanks for checking. Yann (talk) 12:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:16, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2025 at 12:13:32 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV and quality
- Articles in which this image appears
- Mount Kazbek and Kazbegi Municipality
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
- Creator
- MaxBenidze
- Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 12:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment pixelated sky. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Alhtought there are many other beautiful pictures on the page already --Alex Van de Sande (talk) 16:24, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 22:14:25 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Soyuz TMA-2, Soyuz (spacecraft)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there
- Creator
- NASA/Scott Andrews (uploaded by Bricktop)
- Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 22:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment – Russ rocket lifts off pad 22 years ago. Meh. – Sca (talk) 15:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Sca: I didn't understand your comment, could you explain it in a better way? ArionStar (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Routine, predictable, boring. -- Sca (talk) 15:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Sca: I didn't understand your comment, could you explain it in a better way? ArionStar (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - This image and the other are generic rocket launches. You can take a break from FPC, you nominate multiple images each day Wcamp9 (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Question: Is the "wow factor" a factor in enwiki FPCs? ArionStar (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know - but I am not changing my mind because this picture along with the other one are not pictures that deserve to be FP as they are not the best photos. I would much rather prefer a picture of Soyuz in the sky, but I suggest you do not nominate another image as I have told you this for the fourth time currently Wcamp9 (talk) 02:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's curious because I would imagine that it could pass on Commnons due to the wow factor present in the image, but… different FPs sections… different criteria… 🤔 Get a digital camera and take some pictures are good options… ArionStar (talk) 02:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know - but I am not changing my mind because this picture along with the other one are not pictures that deserve to be FP as they are not the best photos. I would much rather prefer a picture of Soyuz in the sky, but I suggest you do not nominate another image as I have told you this for the fourth time currently Wcamp9 (talk) 02:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Question: Is the "wow factor" a factor in enwiki FPCs? ArionStar (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Beautiful shot! --Alex Van de Sande (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 22:01:10 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Soyuz TMA-8, Missão Centenário
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there
- Creator
- NASA/Bill Ingalls (uploaded by Bricktop)
- Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment – Russ rocket lifts off pad 19 years ago. Meh. – Sca (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - while weather is not always optimal, the weather kind nof changes the lighting of the photo overall Wcamp9 (talk) 02:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. / RemoveRedSky [talk] 16:27, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ArionStar (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 12:00:12 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality image. High EV. FP on Commons. Read more about the subject
- Articles in which this image appears
- Pocillopora grandis, Pomacentrus pavo
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Aviafanboi (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support High EV, nice light, excellent sharpness for an underwater picture, at this resolution. Blue fish are an interesting addition to the cohabitation, and enriching in terms of art and wow factor. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent! --Janke | Talk 18:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice contrast. ArionStar (talk) 20:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 15:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support! / RemoveRedSky [talk] 20:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 12:06:12 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. Illustrates article well with high EV. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- European ground squirrel
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Aviafanboi (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Sun shines through the eye. Fair composition, high EV, excellent quality. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 20:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:09, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 12:14:15 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality image. Adds value to article. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Red-crowned woodpecker
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Aviafanboi (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition and beautiful bokeh. Good quality, and educational image. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 20:47, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:06, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2025 at 21:25:48 (UTC)
- Reason
- high resolution and quality copy of a notable film. First nomination. The file was deleted as the source novel was not yet in the public domain, and then undeleted on January 1st, 2025.
- Articles in which this image appears
- A Farewell to Arms (1932 film)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- Frank Borzage, uploaded by Yann
- Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 21:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Sync problem - audio appears to be several frames late. Is this only on my equipment? --Janke | Talk 16:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's an issue with the YouTube video this came from. I can upload an alt from a different source if that would help. hinnk (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Hinnk: Please do. Yann (talk) 08:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Added an alternate version which should address the sync issue. hinnk (talk) 10:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Hinnk: Please do. Yann (talk) 08:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's an issue with the YouTube video this came from. I can upload an alt from a different source if that would help. hinnk (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Alt --Yann (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Alt --Janke | Talk 10:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Alt --Carlosmarkos2345 | Talk 01:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Alt – Moonreach (talk) 19:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2025 at 04:56:33 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV and importance of the subject
- Articles in which this image appears
- Nader Shah, Tomb of Nader Shah, Mashad, etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture
- Creator
- Cyaxares7 (designed by Hooshang Seyhoun)
- Support as nominator – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Quality is not the best, sorry. ArionStar (talk) 14:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment – As often the case with equestrian monuments, identity, EV of subject not readily apparent. – Sca (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality. Look at the bush at the lower right corner. Also tilted and harsh light. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. / RemoveRedSky [talk] 16:30, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2025 at 02:03:10 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV and useful
- Articles in which this image appears
- War on drugs, Just Say No and List of anti-cannabis organizations
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others
- Creator
- National Library of Medicine - History of Medicine
- Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 02:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - always remember that a "High EV" doesn't make a poor quality photo one worth being featured. I am saying this beacuse if you look at the image closely, you see many specks Wcamp9 (talk) 02:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Right… I'm still understanding the wiki FP criteria… ArionStar (talk) 02:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 22:52:11 (UTC)
- Reason
- A rare color image (there is more to come of other people now that I have uploaded color images by Carl Van Vechten) of Louis Armstrong which is high quality.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Louis Armstrong, Jazz, New Orleans
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Harry Warnecke and Gus Schoenbaechler / restored by Wcamp9
- Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please wait for a week before nomination. Yann (talk) 10:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don’t understand? Why? Wcamp9 (talk) 14:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann I only have one other nomination on here and I see no reason why I have to wait. Wcamp9 (talk) 15:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- See FPC criterium #5, [1]. It is a better photo, though. --Janke | Talk 16:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- But take a look at his right index finger - what happened there? Not in the original... --Janke | Talk 16:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support latest version --Janke | Talk 10:07, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Issue fixed Wcamp9 (talk) 20:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- But take a look at his right index finger - what happened there? Not in the original... --Janke | Talk 16:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- See FPC criterium #5, [1]. It is a better photo, though. --Janke | Talk 16:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Like I said on your Commons talk page, the restoration should be done from the original TIFF file, which is of higher resolution, and with less compression. Yann (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I did again the restoration from the TIFF with less compression. Yann (talk) 19:44, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – the background isn't ideal and has some blemishes, but the rest of it is good for a semi-historic photo. Bammesk (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 02:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 19:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Nominations — to be closed
[edit]Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.
Older nominations requiring additional input from users
[edit]These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.
Closing procedure
[edit]A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js
When NOT promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing
{{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}}
on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.
When promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
- Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
- Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Add the image to:
- Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
- Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
- Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
- The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
- Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
- Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
- If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
- Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
- If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}}
to the top of the section. - Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the January archive. This is done by simply adding the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}}
from this page to the bottom of the archive. - If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Delist closing procedure
[edit]Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.
If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:
- Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.
If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace the
{{Featured picture}}
tag from the image with{{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}
. - Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.
If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
- Replace the
{{Featured picture}}
tag from the delisted image with{{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}
. - Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
- Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
- Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}}
to the top of the section. - Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}}
to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive. - If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Recently closed nominations
[edit]Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 21:52:51 (UTC)
- Reason
- Quality lead image in Wind wave article. It has been the lead image for 2+ years. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Wind wave
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
- Creator
- Joaquim Alves Gaspar
- Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 21:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 10:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 11:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 18:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Aviafanboi (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:Porto Covo Outubro 2014-3.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 21:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 16:46:22 (UTC)
- Reason
- high quality portrait used as lead image
- Articles in which this image appears
- Martyna Majok
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
- Creator
- Fuzheado
- Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 16:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus and depth of field. Useful picture of a famous woman. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 18:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Aviafanboi (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:Pulitzer2018-portraits-martyna-majok-2676.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 16:35:04 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV and quality
- Articles in which this image appears
- Brumadinho dam disaster, Tailings dam and Tailings dam failure
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
- Creator
- Ibama (uploaded by Tm)
- Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 16:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 14:35:58 (UTC)
- Reason
- EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- 1980 actors strike
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American
- Creator
- R. L. Oliver
- Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 14:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment – Jumbled comp, poor detail. – Sca (talk) 15:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Sca, Adam Cuerden: restoration? ArionStar (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 11:29:07 (UTC)
- Reason
- Featured on Commons. Headline image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Riyadh etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
- Creator
- B.alotaby
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 10:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose This is more a photo of the sky than the district. Most drone type photos of this district I've seen elsewhere show the bases of the buildings as well. As such, EV seems modest. Nick-D (talk) 10:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose – That cut off medical center building in the foreground messes up the composition for me. It makes the frame look crowded and takes too much away from what's behind it. Otherwise I'd have supported. Bammesk (talk) 18:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:Riyadh Skyline.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 11:04:49 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons. Illustrates article well.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Elizabeth II, List of works by Philip de László
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
- Creator
- Philip de László
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 14:42, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:05, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 20:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:Philip de László - Princess Elizabeth of York - 1933.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:58, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 22:36:17 (UTC)
- Reason
- Huge image (9,069 by 6,046 pixels). Great framing as well; FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Zanskar Range, Ladakh
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
- Creator
- Timothy A. Gonsalves
- Support as nominator – EF5 22:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Impressive relief with the snow. The road gives the impression that these mountains are very accessible. Big road with distant focal point, and then above huge mountains with snow. It gives the feeling that after this road there's a path, and climbing up this path leads to the top. I'm sure it's much more difficult, and that's probably why the picture is interesting. Kind of "direct access to impressive peaks". -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 10:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support @EF5: Thanks for the nomination. Tagooty (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- No problem, your works are amazing! :) EF5 23:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:Road Padum Zanskar Range Jun24 A7CR 00818.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 22:41, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 19:09:16 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality lead image in Integrated circuit and Display driver articles. This is a large file 146 MB, you can open it in ZoomViewer on the file page.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Integrated circuit, Display driver
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Electronics
- Creator
- Cole L
- Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 19:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:NXP PCF8577C LCD driver with I²C (Colour Corrected).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 19:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 17:57:09 (UTC)
- Reason
- Quality lead image of its article. Saw this on Commons FPC.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Proboscis bat, Emballonuridae
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Rhododendrites
- Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support These bats look like natural branches of a tree. Appealing light, high level of detail, and great background, that makes the subject standing out visually. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 14:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:08, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:Proboscis bats (81721).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 18:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2025 at 21:23:02 (UTC)
- Reason
- one of the most iconic 1920s animations shorts
- Articles in which this image appears
- The Skeleton Dance, Walt Disney Animation Studios
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- Walt Disney
- Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 21:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Janke | Talk 14:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 10:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – iconic short film Wcamp9 (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 20:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:The Skeleton Dance (1929).webm --Armbrust The Homunculus 06:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2025 at 17:43:42 (UTC)
- Reason
- high EV, perspective corrected image
- Articles this image appears in
- 2024 Hualien earthquake, List of earthquakes in 2024
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Others
- Creator
- Shufu Liu (edited by Basile Morin)
- Support as nominator — Yann (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann: Why is this a delist and replace? The first image isn’t featured. Armbrust The Homunculus 18:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah. I forgot that the first nomination was withdrawn. Fixed. Yann (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support, this one. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:21, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support this perspective corrected. --Janke | Talk 17:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 19:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2025 at 07:58:19 (UTC)
- Reason
- Nice example of H. M. Brock's work, probably reasonable size given the detail of the drawing.
- Articles in which this image appears
- H. M. Brock, The Sorcerer
- FP category for this image
- WP:FP/THEATRE
- Creator
- H. M. Brock, restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 07:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:22, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 20:59, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Promoted File:H.M.Brock - Poster for Gilbert and Sullivan's The Sorcerer (1919).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 08:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Suspended nominations
[edit]This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2025 at 18:47:08 (UTC)
- Reason
- higher resolution, better quality
- Articles this image appears in
- Flinders Street railway station, Flinders Street, Melbourne, History of Melbourne, Trams in Melbourne, Portal:Architecture, etc.
- Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Swanston and Flinders St intersection 1927.jpg
- Nominator
- Yann (talk)
- Delist and replace — Yann (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment This was mentioned in Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates, so I thought I could do it. Restoring the broken glass plate version is beyond my competence, but this is already much better than the current FP. Yann (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mind if I have a go at the glass plate? Quite happy to hand back to you after the repair. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 21:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden: Sure, please do. There is a gap, so it should be cut and move closer. Yann (talk) 16:12, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- I tried it some months ago - my attempt got stuck among the people... ;-) --Janke | Talk 14:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Waiting for Adam's restoration... --Janke | Talk 17:52, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've gotten some of it done, but between the incident on Commons involving Google Translate, and a 12 hour flight back to Edinburgh that I'm just starting to recover from... it's not as fast as I'd hope. I can show what I've done. It's kind of neat being able to read the destinations for each platform. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 02:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Armbrust Honestly, if you want to promote Yann's, I'll be a little bit finishing, and we can rush Yann's work onto the main page. Means his work is recognised. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 00:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Adam, I don't see the point to promote my version if yours will be ready in a few days. Now if it takes one month to finish the restoration, it may be different... Yann (talk) 20:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann: I've done about
a thirdhalftwo-thirds of the detailed pass, now that I've finished fixing the crack and other major damage. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 16:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann: I've done about
- @Adam, I don't see the point to promote my version if yours will be ready in a few days. Now if it takes one month to finish the restoration, it may be different... Yann (talk) 20:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Armbrust Honestly, if you want to promote Yann's, I'll be a little bit finishing, and we can rush Yann's work onto the main page. Means his work is recognised. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 00:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've gotten some of it done, but between the incident on Commons involving Google Translate, and a 12 hour flight back to Edinburgh that I'm just starting to recover from... it's not as fast as I'd hope. I can show what I've done. It's kind of neat being able to read the destinations for each platform. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 02:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Waiting for Adam's restoration... --Janke | Talk 17:52, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment This was mentioned in Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates, so I thought I could do it. Restoring the broken glass plate version is beyond my competence, but this is already much better than the current FP. Yann (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- D. & R. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and Replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist
and replace– it's an improvement. Bammesk (talk) 02:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC) - D and R No doubts. ArionStar (talk) 20:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- It seems that Adam's restauration is coming along pretty fast, so I postpone closure on this one. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:39, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Armbrust, Yann, Hamid Hassani, VulcanSphere, Bammesk, and ArionStar: I've finished the restoration. If it matters, I Support my restoration Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 04:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- For the record, this s the largest rectangle that keeps all verticals vertical. I could try to fill in a little bit on the lower right to allow more at the bottom, or could crop out some of the right side, but this is the largest rectangle without doing that. That's why Yann's restoration - quite rightly: the right hand side building is just all black in that print - has slightly more at the bottom. See File:Flinders Street Station, Melbourne, at the intersection of Swanston Street and Flinders Street, 1927 - Glass plate - Uncropped.jpg. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 05:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've taken the liberty of doing a very small amount of that. Think any more and we're going to hit questionable territory. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 06:31, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- For the record, this s the largest rectangle that keeps all verticals vertical. I could try to fill in a little bit on the lower right to allow more at the bottom, or could crop out some of the right side, but this is the largest rectangle without doing that. That's why Yann's restoration - quite rightly: the right hand side building is just all black in that print - has slightly more at the bottom. See File:Flinders Street Station, Melbourne, at the intersection of Swanston Street and Flinders Street, 1927 - Glass plate - Uncropped.jpg. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 05:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Armbrust, Yann, Hamid Hassani, VulcanSphere, Bammesk, and ArionStar: I've finished the restoration. If it matters, I Support my restoration Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 04:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Adam's restoration from glass plate – That's a lot of work, and well done. Bammesk (talk) 04:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Adam's Restoration Vulcan has affirmed his support for the glass plate restoration. –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Adam's restoration -- Great work! Yann (talk) 09:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)